I agree with all of these statements but one thing to keep in mind when thinking about the 718's flat 4 turbo is potential with just a tune. The Cayman S C&D tested at Lightning Lap weighed 3162 lb. And don't forget the 718 gained around 100 lb of curb weight over the 981. The sound of the flat 6 screaming behind your head is worth a few tenths of a second penalty over the pedestrian flat 4 rumble. Both will reach 60 mph in the low 4s and top out over 170 mph.
Scion tc turbo vs sti manual#
Even more so if you equip both with a manual transmission (the turbo engine can take more advantage of the PDK transmission). The flat four powered 718 isn't really THAT much faster than the old naturally aspirated flat 6 models either. And the added complexity that comes with the flat four (2 stage intercooler system, active engine mounts) are not maintenance items I would want to have to deal with. Especially the Cayman, which is Porsche's smallest volume model. They're not selling well, so I wouldn't count on them having much depreciation in a few years time. And the rear end treatment is a bit tacky/gimmicky. I think it looks cheaper because they simplified the front lower fascia. I've seen the current ones and although they are faster, they look cheaper to me.Īgreed. I also prefer the 981's with the flat 6 engine. Hopefully in time when I am ready I can afford a new Porsche too Personally going to keep my twin for a long time and have fun modding it and enjoying it for what it is - a brilliant rwd platform! The roof down on a sunny day was great fun, but I’d own a cayman rather (more practical and a smidge better to drive). Engaging, fun, and good quality (even the older 2 I drove). Just not lastest gen ones.Īnd it’s a similar car in terms of the driving dynamics. I drove an older model boxster and a cayman. I really enjoy my brz and it provides tons of joy, but just thinking of what the next car will be when it comes time! and certainly its a more expensive car, but a few year old model is around the price of most new entry level luxury sedans/crossovers these days. Thos L.For anyone who changed from a twin over to a last generation cayman (not the s), how do you find the difference in driving experience? it seems like it would be somewhat familiar, with 275 hp and 213 tq - that youd need to wring the power out in revs and that you'd really have fun throwing it around corners. While fans of edgy cars with high horsepower and super-firm suspension may shy away from the Scion tC, brainy enthusiasts who recognize a sporting bargain backed by Toyota's reputation for durability and reliability will love it.
Scion tc turbo vs sti drivers#
Some of our drivers felt the interior lacked the quality look and feel they expected, while others thought it was just fine. The 5-speed gearbox was well matched to the engine's performance, but it would benefit from the optional short-shift kit, as the throws were longer than we liked. Everyone agreed, though, that the suspension tuning needed work - as one editor noted, "The good news is the supercharger hits hard and low in the rev band the bad news is the chassis can't handle the power." But on the street it was a point-and-squirt hit. During our autocross runs, the Scion displayed a lack of suspension firmness and a lot of understeer, making it less than ideal in this sort of at-the-limit driving. Performance is important in this segment of the market, and the Scion holds up adequately: 0–60 mph in 6.9 seconds and the quarter mile in 15.1, albeit placing it last in this group. The base tC, with a price of $16,200, has just about all the stuff anyone could want: 2.4-liter dohc 4-cylinder, 5-speed manual, 4-wheel disc brakes with ABS and rack-and-pinion steering.Then add 7 grand worth of options, including the $3200 TRD supercharger, and for $23,403 out the door you have an exciting sports coupe. Toyota has made great strides in the youth market with its Scion brand and for good reasons: very good cars at very reasonable prices.
0 kommentar(er)
